Wednesday, August 25, 2010
Last Sunday - No sermon
Sunday, August 15, 2010
Sunday 15 August - Faithful Witnesses - Acts 1:15-26
One of the biggest issues that the Church is facing today is about the authority of the Bible. People question whether or not a holy book which sums up human history in just over six thousand years and took 1500 years to compile is relevant in the 21st century. Because of this, traditional customs and values are constantly being scrutinized, challenged, and changed. What was good enough for Paul and Silas may be good enough for old time religion but, according to some, it certainly isn’t good enough for modern people.
Today’s passage from Acts deals with similar questions. Luke continues to write about the beginning of the Christian church as an apologetic, an answer, and as an historical and theological reply to those who were asking such questions as:
Where did Peter get his authority to preach? What makes the Gospel different from other religious messages? What really happened to Judas Iscariot and did Jesus make an almighty mistake in choosing him in the first place?
I’ve mentioned to you to look out for and watch what the Holy Spirit does throughout the Book of Acts. In today’s passage, several noteworthy things and teaching moments take place. Luke writes that Peter stood up amongst the Gathering and suggested that they find a successor for Judas. Peter believes that this is necessary to perfect their leadership number of twelve in order to maintain continuity with the twelve tribes of Israel.
Peter also states that Judas’ betrayal of Christ was foretold a thousand years beforehand, through the work of the Holy Spirit inspiring King David as he composed several psalms. This maintains the continuity of the first Christians with their Jewish roots, but it also showed them that the Holy Spirit had been working for centuries in the sacred history of Peter’s people in order to bring about salvation through Christ.
This is very important for us to understand and accept because it deals with the authority of scripture, which is one of our major issues facing our people today. The Holy Spirit actively inspired David to write words in his psalms which became fulfilled prophecies in Christ’s lifetime. The Holy Spirit did this and we need to remember that. As John Calvin wrote five hundred years ago, “Such manner of speeches bring greater reverence to the scriptures… (because) …they were directed by the Holy Spirit.”
This is why I personally think it that questioning the authority of the scriptures is not something to be undertaken lightly, or to glibly cast aside the Bible because of its cultural contexts. The great arrogance and mischief can arise when we question Biblical authority because we are in danger of saying and believing that we know better than the Holy Spirit about the Word of God. And that, my dear friends, was the very first temptation and sin in the Garden of Eden when the serpent tempts Eve beginning with the words “Did God really say…?” (Genesis 3:1)
But why is Peter mentioning Judas at all and why does Luke fill in the details about Judas’ death?
Peter is bringing resolution for himself and the rest of the Gathering. Judas had been with them for three years. Despite his obvious faults, he was still one of them. John Calvin stated that “It is not to be doubted that the disciples did remember Judas with grief and sorrow.” In the midst of all their joy about the Resurrection of Christ, the shadow of Judas’ betrayal and tragedy of his death still affected them. To bring closure to their sorrow, they have to appoint a successor. To find relief from their grief, they have to accept that the Holy Spirit foretold this long ago.
Luke fills in the details about Judas’ death and his gory ending, not because he wanted to shock his readers, but because in Luke’s time there were already rumors surrounding what had actually happened to the traitor. Some misguided Christians, who would later be known as Gnostics, began to think that Judas did not commit suicide but that he nobly sacrificed himself by taking Christ’s place on the cross. Their stories are very similar to what Charles Dickens would write 1800 years later in his famous book “A Tale of Two Cities” where the anti-hero Sydney Carton dies at the guillotine in place of the hero Charles Darnay. No doubts the Gnostics of the past would love to have borrowed Dickens’ words and place them in the mouth of Judas Iscariot as he died on the Cross for Jesus: “It is a far, far better thing that I do, than I have ever done; it is a far, far better rest that I go to, than I have ever known.”
But this never happened, which is why Luke includes the gory details about Judas’ death – a fatal falling to the ground which causes his stomach to burst open and all of his intestines fall out – which happens when someone dies and dangles from a rope for a while and then the noose breaks. (This is also why in England traitors were hung and disemboweled).
This in turn brings us to another question: did Jesus make a mistake in choosing Judas in the first place, or as John Calvin put it: “It seems a strange thing that Judas, who was chosen by Christ for such an excellent ministry, should fall so filthily.”
Did Jesus make a mistake? Well that’s like asking “Did God make a mistake in creating Adam and Eve?” The short answer to both questions is a loud and affirmative “No.”
The mistakes that were made by Judas, Adam, and Eve were all committed through their own free will and subsequently their own foolish choices. Judas fell away, not because he had been compelled to through prophecy, but only by the malice of his own heart. John McArthur, a great contemporary preacher that I admire, has this to say:
“Judas represents the greatest example of wasted opportunity in all of history.”
McArthur also goes on to say: “Although he was counted among the apostles and received his portion in their ministry, Judas was obviously never saved.”
“Judas was obviously never saved.” We all make mistakes and Judas tragically paid the price for his act of betrayal. He couldn’t live with himself or of the fact that he had placed Christ into the hands of His enemies. If Judas had been saved, he might have heeded Christ’s warning to him before the Last Supper. If Judas had been saved, he might have been able to go into hiding and come back to Christ after the Resurrection and plead for forgiveness. Had he been saved and if he had done that, Judas would have been shown mercy by Jesus and fully restored to God’s favor. But Judas was not saved and so he believed that God could not help him, nor could Jesus be gracious to him. And so the tragedy of Judas lies not in the sad fact that he committed suicide, but that he did not give Christ the opportunity to forgive him. He died in his sins, instead of being saved from them.
When Peter talks about the need to find a successor for Judas, he also lays out the conditions and qualifications for such a person. It would have to be someone who was with Jesus from the very beginning and who had seen the Risen Christ. In other words, it had to be someone who had remained a faithful follower of Christ, and an exclusive witness of his Resurrection. This new apostle would have to preach the Gospel and take the exclusive message of the Resurrection to other people. He would have to have been taught personally by Christ and have been an eye witness to the post-resurrection appearances of Christ. In other words, he had to validate his faith with personal accounts of who Jesus was and what actually happened after He rose from the dead.
This brings us to a very important point about sharing the gospel. Many misguided Christians believe that sharing the gospel is about good deeds, kind words, and nice acts of compassion. These are wonderful things to do on behalf of the church, but sharing the gospel is not about how many good deeds we get done in a day. Sharing the gospel has always meant one important thing – it is about telling a dying world full of dying people that Christ still lives! Without the Resurrection, there is no gospel, and without the constant telling of the Resurrection, there will be no salvation. As Paul the apostle once wrote to the church of Corinth, “If Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile; you are still in your sins.”
Finally, a successor is chosen. The Upper Room Gathering of about 120 people selects two candidates and leaves the final choice up to the Holy Spirit using the customary method of applying lots. This is the last occasion in the Bible that lots are used. After the Great Day of Pentecost, lots will no longer be needed because the Holy Spirit will directly guide the apostles and Christ’s church.
The use of lots is not like throwing dice or picking door prizes. The apostles use the lots as a sacred means of giving the final decision over to God. This is not spinning the bottle, the tossing of a coin, or hoping for a win. This is sacred nomination and final affirmation given by the Holy Spirit. Luke tells us that they say together a very special prayer: Then they prayed, "LORD, you know everyone's heart. Show us which of these two you have chosen to take over this apostolic ministry...."
Through the presence of the Holy Spirit, Matthias is chosen, whose name actually means “The gift of the Lord.” We don’t hear anything else about this new apostle in the Bible, but some ancient documents of the early church say that Matthias first preached the gospel throughout Judea and then he went down into Ethiopia and Sudan to preach to cannibals and pagans. He was eventually crucified, so Judas’s successor actually went to the cross for the sake of Jesus and his Gospel.
So what have we learned today? (1) The Holy Spirit has been at work for thousands of years. (2) Scripture is inspired by the Holy Spirit, so we should all be wary of believing that we know better than the bible. (3) If we are open to the Holy Spirit, then He will guide us clearly; but if we become divided, we will end up making bad choices as a Church and will suffer the consequences.
Prayer: Lord, You know everyone’s heart here today. Show us the way, through the Sacred Presence of the Holy Spirit, that our church should take to fulfill Your ministry and mission in this community. In Your Holy Name, we pray. Amen.
Study Resources
Links
John Macarthur’s Bible Study page: “Grace to You”
http://www.gty.org/
Apostle Matthias Information
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/10066a.htm
Home Study and Personal Reflections
1. What made Peter suggest that the Upper Room group needed to choose a successor to Judas??
2. What do you think about Luke’s account of Judas’ death? What makes us feel sorry for Judas?
3. How much of a priority is Christ in our lives? Do we ever allow other things to take His place?
4. Where does the authority of the Bible come from? Why should this make us cautious about criticizing the Scriptures?
Sunday, August 8, 2010
Sunday 8 August - All in the Family - Acts 1:10-14
A couple of years ago, when Evelyn and I took our youngest daughter Lauren to the airport to start her journey and mission trip to Tanzania, Africa, we waited with her up until the last possible second. We stood in line with Lauren to make sure that her tickets and luggage were validated. We walked her up to the security gate and hugged her just before she got into line. We watched her go through the security system and saw that she picked up her carryon bag and shoes. She then turned the corner and disappeared out of view. We just didn’t want to let go of her physically or emotionally until she was totally out of sight. And before the terrible events of 9/11, we once would have waited until the flight took off and watched the plane until it went up into the clouds.
The disciples felt the same thing. They peered intently at the sky until their eyes were sore. They didn’t want to lose sight of Jesus. They wanted Him to always be there. They didn’t want to give Him up emotionally because once He was gone from view, then the responsibility of His Mission and God’s kingdom would firmly be placed upon their shoulders.
Perhaps they were also hoping that Christ would change His mind, turn around, and head back down to Earth. If that was the case, then they were quickly given a reality check by the two angels who suddenly appeared beside them.
"Men of Galilee," they said, "why do you stand here looking into the sky? This same Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come back in the same way you have seen him go into heaven."
This was the first lesson that the disciples were given without Jesus being present after the Resurrection. This also became crucial to their ministries and mission, their preaching and message. Christ would return, suddenly and surprisingly. No amount of wishing would bring Him back before His appointed return, but when it did happen it would occur swiftly and suddenly, without words or warnings.
So this shaped their discipleship of Christ. They were to live their lives appropriately as Christ’s followers and in the strong belief that Jesus would return at any time.
Two thousand years have almost passed since that day of the Ascension and we have perhaps grown complacent about Christ’s Second Coming, but let’s seriously remember this: we are now two thousand years nearer to His imminent return than these first disciples ever were – should that in itself not make us more careful and circumspect about how we live our Christian lives? We are, time-wise, nearer to Christ’s Second Coming than any generation before us, so instead of being complacent, shouldn’t we be even more prepared?
I find it interesting to note that John Calvin, the great reformer, uses this passage to support his argument against the transubstantiation doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church. They believe that the bread and wine in Communion actually becomes the real body and blood of Jesus Christ. John Calvin argued that because Christ ascended into Heaven, and would not return to Earth until God’s appointed time, His actual body and blood could never be present with us. If that was the case, then it would mean that Jesus had broken His promise and disobeyed God; it would also mean that the two angels lied. For Calvin, Christ’s Spirit is present with us in the preaching of the Word and the celebrating of the sacraments, but Jesus’ physical presence won’t ever be experienced on Earth again until He finally returns at the Second Coming.
Talking about returning, the disciples eventually walk away from the Mount of Olives and head back into Jerusalem. This is a very brave thing to do – they are headed back into the heart of enemy territory where Christ Himself had been arrested, tortured, and executed. At any given moment an informer, guard, or even a priest could have recognized them as Christ’s followers.
We are told from Luke that the distance was a Sabbath Day’s walk, which meant that it was only three quarters of a mile of a journey. They head upstairs to a large guest room which may have been the same Upper Room where Christ shared their Last supper together before His crucifixion. This location would help them to keep emotionally connected to Christ, in much the same way that we all feel when we visit a family home, a past workplace, or even an old church that we used to go to. In that room, they had shared Christ’s last moments of teaching and giving. As they broke bread together and prayed there, they must have re-experienced that holy and sacred time.
This is why I think it’s important to bring our families to church on a regular basis. We need to give them a sanctuary, a trysting place, a holy place of worship and prayer in their lives. It’s really important for them to feel spiritually loved and embraced by God in His House. And it’s especially important for our new college students and school leavers. They need somewhere to come back to and belong, to pray in and worship, especially during crucial times and major issues in their young lives. If it was good and healthy enough for the first disciples to return to the upper room, it’s also good for all of us to return to those holy and sacred places that have impacted our lives with the presence of Christ.
Luke mentions the names of the eleven disciples who return to the Upper Room. At one point, ten of them, excluding young John, had run away from Christ when He was being crucified. Now they all return together, obeying Christ’s last command to wait in Jerusalem. They did not know what was going to occur, but they also did not question Christ’s command.
For at least ten days, they would have met together in the room with some of Christ’s own family. This would have brought about some interesting group dynamics and an intense therapy session for all of them.
Think about it for a moment; Christ is gone, so the old wounds amongst them may have opened up. There was John and James, the ambitious sons of thunder who went to Jesus in secret and asked for favorable places of prominence in Christ’s Coming kingdom. They even caused an argument within the group about who was the greatest among them. Now with Jesus gone up into heaven, the old argument could have quickly resurfaced.
And then there was Peter, who had proudly declared that he would have laid down his life for Christ, and yet he had been scared off by a mere girl, a serving maid outside the Sanhedrin.
Added to the mix, were Jesus’ own family members – his mother and his brothers. From the gospel passage that we read this morning (Mark 3:20-21, 31-35) we know that before His Resurrection that they didn’t fully support Christ’s ministry. At one point, they thought that He was crazy and anxiously sought to bring Him back home before He did Himself any damage.
So you have all these people, followers and family with major dysfunctions and they are gathered together, almost like a funeral party, to mourn Christ’s absence and grieve His disappearance.
But something almighty has changed them…and that change has occurred through the Resurrection. They have seen Christ alive after being dead, and so their lives will never be the same again. There is no ‘greatest’ amongst them because Christ’s greatness cannot be equaled. There is no denial amongst them, because they have seen Jesus with their own eyes and heard Him speak with their own ears. And there is no fear of craziness or insanity in Christ, because He has proved to them who He actually is – the Savior of the world and the Everlasting Son of God.
And so this time in the Upper Room becomes a sacred moment of peace and reconciliation, humility and fellowship, recommitment and restoration. They all joined together in constant prayer – praising God for what had occurred and communicating with Christ’s Spirit. They could not see Him or touch Him, but through focused and determined prayer, they could feel His presence with them as they spiritually connected to Him. They were beginning to become a family of faith. They were beginning to become what we would one day call ‘church.’
So to sum up, what have we learned from this passage today?
Firstly, that Christ will one day swiftly, surprisingly, and suddenly return, therefore we should live each day as Christians who expect His imminent arrival.
Secondly, that Christ invites and brings together failures of all kinds to become His followers, and that we each have a holy and human need for sacred gathering places.
And finally, that to become church, we need to constantly pray together, worship together, and just be together, so that we may experience fellowship as a true family of faith.
Prayer: Lord Jesus, thank You for returning to Heaven so that Your Church could be established and that we, two thousand years later, may be given the opportunity of being restored to God through the forgiveness of our sins. Help us to become a loving family of faith, a compassionate congregation, and a community church of disciples and followers, servants and messengers. In Your Holy Name, we humbly and thankfully pray. Amen.
Home Study and Personal Reflections
1. Why do you think that Jesus returned to Heaven and did not stay on earth to be with His disciples and family?
2. How can we live our lives each day as if we are anticipating Christ’s imminent return? How will that belief affect our everyday choices?
3. Where are the sacred places in our own lives? In what ways do we experience Christ and faith there?
4. How can we make our church more effective at making us followers of Christ and a true family of faith?
Other Resources
Mount of Olives
Ascension of Jesus
Being the Church 2 by William Loader
Kids Pages –Jesus Ascends
Sunday, August 1, 2010
Sunday 1 August - Serving by Waiting - Acts 01:1-9
The best way to begin this two year study of Acts is to understand the basic questions of who, what, where, when, and why about the written word. I know that it sounds like Journalism 101, but it’s important to know what the background was of this remarkable book in order to recognize how it should impact our church and our lives today.
Who wrote the book is relatively easy to answer: it was Luke, the glorious physician, a convert to Christ, the writer of the third gospel and a travelling companion of the apostle Paul.
In one of the documents of the second century, we are given a brief biography of him.
“Luke was a Greek speaking native of the Syrian city Antioch, by profession a physician. He had become a disciple of the apostle Paul and later followed Paul until his martyrdom. Having served the Lord continuously, unmarried and without children, filled with the Holy Spirit he died at the age of 84 years.”
“Who is the book about?” is a question that has various answers. Firstly, the Book of Acts is about the work of the Holy Spirit and how His powerful presence established the Christian Church. Secondly, the book is about the ministries of Peter, the Big Fisherman, who was part of Christ’s original band of twelve, and also of Paul, Christ’s Chosen Apostle to the Gentiles, who were the non-Jews living in various communities and cities along the Mediterranean. Other characters and disciples appear in the Book of Acts, but Peter and Paul are the main heroes in Luke’s account.
Who was the book written for? Luke addresses this in the first verse – it’s written to a person called Theophilus. The name is Greek and it means “God seeker” or the “one who loves God.” Theophilus may have been a real person, esteemed by Luke for his influence and perhaps wealth. He may also have been one of Luke’s former patients. He could also have been someone who was being instructed in the faith, which may also mean that “Theophilus” is just a general term for anyone who wanted to become a Christian in the newly formed churches of the Mediterranean.
Now we turn to the question of What. What is the Book of Acts?
Firstly, it’s an historical document which relates the initial experiences of Christ’s disciples in the wider world after the Ascension of Christ. The Great Reformer John Calvin and the Father of Presbyterianism wrote that “if there was no Book of Acts, then it would appear in history that Christ’s ministry ended with His Ascension.” In other words, if we did not have Luke’s account, we probably would never have heard of Christ at all.
The Book is also an accurate historical document because Luke is very careful in listing the details, names, and powers of various rulers and governors in the Roman Empire. This adds authenticity to what is written and is also a valid insight into how cases and appeals, citizenship and authority were experienced in the first century.
The question of When the book was written has puzzled many biblical scholars. Some used to think that it was written centuries later after the events as an historical story in much the same way that authors today write about George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and other patriarchs of the American War of Independence.
These days, most scholars agree that the book was written and completed about AD 63 – 1900 years before President Kennedy was assassinated and approximately 36 years after Christ was crucified. The conclusion that it could not have been written later than AD 63 is based upon several reasons.
Firstly, the Roman Emperor Nero began to persecute Christians in AD 64. Throughout the Book of Acts, Roman leaders and governors whimsically and sometimes favorably interview Paul on several occasions. After AD 64, this could not have been the case because the Roman authorities became hostile towards adherents of the Faith.
Secondly, both Peter and Paul were strongly believed to have been executed during Nero’s persecution. Because Luke is so detail oriented, he would certainly have contained those events at the end of the Book of Acts. Their deaths are not mentioned, so therefore we conclude that the book was written before AD64.
And thirdly, the Jerusalem Temple was completely destroyed by the Romans in AD70. If Luke had written his historical account much later, he would certainly have included such a cataclysmic event in his narrative because it had such a profound effect upon the young Christian community and was indeed a fulfilled prophecy that Christ had foretold during His Earthly ministry.
Where the Book of Acts was written has several answers. The first half of the book may have been written in Jerusalem or even Luke’s hometown of Antioch, where followers of Christ were called Christians for the very first time. Some of it may have been written later in Rome to help the Gentile Christians there understand the roots of their faith.
Curiously, the latter parts of the book read like a personal journal which Luke recorded as he travelled with Paul, which means that it was written on the go. As a writer myself, I believe that Luke used his journal as the source material for his descriptions of the events in Paul’s life. For some reason or another, (perhaps the outbreak of persecution?), Luke did not get around to editing the last part of the Book of Acts, which is why it reads more like a raw travel log rather than a carefully crafted and creative narrative for his readers.
Our last question, as a means of introducing us to the Book of Acts, is perhaps the most important of all – why did Luke write such a book, after all wasn’t the Gospel enough for any would be follower of Christ?
Several suggestions to this question have been made. Firstly, some suggest that when Paul was put on trial in Rome before the Emperor, Luke’s account was the actual defense document that was used to try to influence Nero to give Paul a favorable judgment. If that was the case, then it failed completely.
Secondly, the document may just have been Luke’s memoirs, written for himself and close friends to re-experience the good old days, in much the same way that we all experience past events when we read family letters or personal journals from decades ago.
Thirdly, and perhaps most importantly, the Book of Acts was a permanent historically written record of the initial events that saw the empowerment and establishment of the Christian church. It was meant to be read by future followers of the faith as a means to teach them about Christ, His message, the Holy Spirit, and God’s ever expanding Kingdom here on Earth.
It is this last suggestion that is so important to us today. As we read and study the Book of Acts, we will come to recognize and understand that the work of the Holy Spirit is revealed through the witness, testimonies, and stories of real people. It will help us to know what Christ did through the Holy Spirit long ago, so that we may see and know what He is doing in the church and world today. As Calvin also wrote, “Christ conquers the world with simple souls who become the voice of the Gospel…and the Holy Spirit is the power of the Gospel in the world.”
So that’s some of the background to the Book of Acts, but what can we quickly learn from today’s passage?
Firstly, the Book of Acts begins in the forty day period just after the Resurrection. Christ appears to His followers, giving them many proofs that He was alive, and teaching them about the kingdom of God. These signs and proofs were vitally important to Christ’s followers because whenever and wherever they preached the Gospel, the first question that would be asked is one that is still raised today: how do you know that Christ rose from the dead? And the answer to that question was deeply personal and meant that they would have to make a lifetime commitment to Christ: they would simply answer: “I know it’s true because I was there to see Him.”
Secondly, Christ commands them to wait in Jerusalem for the gift of the Holy Spirit. To a certain degree, Jesus is testing them and showing them that patience is a sacred means of serving God. Perhaps some of them, like Peter, wanted to immediately get out and tell the whole world about Christ’s Resurrection and Salvation. If they had done it without waiting, praying, and pondering then Christ’s ministry would have soon collapsed because they would have been doing it on their own strength. Waiting for the Spirit stopped them from being hasty and superficial. Waiting on God’s promise was a way of respecting Christ’s teaching and of truly giving themselves to God’s work.
At this moment in time, we are going through a similar experience. This church is in the process of being renovated, but a greater event will follow if we wait patiently for the Spirit. By the end of November, the contractors will have moved out and we will then want to move on ahead with the reinvigoration, resurgence, and resurrection of our congregation in this community. However, if we do this on our own, we will soon run out of steam and all this new building will be worthless to us. But if we truly wait, pray, and ponder for the Spirit, then there will come a time when we will know when, where, and how Christ wants us to use the betterment of our church for God’s work and kingdom in this community.
Finally, Christ tells His followers that He is appointing them as His witnesses in Jerusalem, Judea, Samaria and to the end of the Earth. They were to become His ‘martuses’, the Greek word for witnesses, from which we derive the term “martyrs.” They were to spend, give, and perhaps even sacrifice their lives for His ministry.
They were to be Christ’s martuses in Jerusalem, the heart of the conservative, traditional and religious powers of the Jewish people.
They were to be Christ’s martuses in all of Judea, the center of Herod’s authority and of Roman imperial power.
They were to be martuses in Samaria, the community of religious outcasts who were despised by the Jews and treated as heretics. They were the illegal theological immigrants in the Holy Land and enemies of God’s chosen people.
And finally, they were to be Christ’s martuses to the ends of the Earth. In other words, no one and nowhere were ever to be excluded from the hearing of the Gospel. All people everywhere, in any time and place, were to be given the message of the Gospel.
The questions that we need to ask ourselves today are these: are we willing to wait for the Holy Spirit? And where does Christ expect us to be martuses for Him in our everyday lives and to our local community?
LET US PRAY
Lord Jesus, we praise You for the inspired and historical writing of the Book of Acts. We pray that we may open our hearts and minds to the many messages that this sacred record contains. We also ask for patience and the ability to serve You by waiting for the Holy Spirit to come among us. Bless us now with Your love and compassion. In Your Holy Name, we pray. Amen.
Home Study and Personal Reflections
1. Where do you see the Holy Spirit working in the life and work of our congregation?
2. How important is it to wait upon the Spirit’s guidance before we make important decisions?
3. Where should our church be witnessing to the people of this community?
4. How do we share our faith with other people? What would make us more effective?
Other Resources
How to be a Disciple by Dallas Willard
http://tinyurl.com/c7xae2
Scripting the Transformation by Amy Butler
http://tinyurl.com/33uu9xv
Bible study Questions by Ray Bucknell
http://tinyurl.com/2uuyx92
Kids Activity – eBible for kids – Jesus Ascends
http://tinyurl.com/332wt32
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)